Greg K-H Recommends New Kernel Version Naming
Greg Kroah-Hartman, Linux developer at Novell, suggests a new naming scheme for the Kernel releases on the Kernel mailing list. The four-digit year would be included in the name.
Kroah-Hartman writes that he had meant to bring up his suggestion at the Kernel Summit 2008 in September that he does now as a follow-up. He had always been involved with version numbering and finds the current scheme unmanageable.
His recommendation: future versions of the Linux kernel should follow the pattern four_digit_year.release_number.minor_release_number. By this pattern the first release in the coming year would be 2009.0.0, the second 2009.1.0, and so forth. If zero-numbered releases are undesirable, he says, the year could also begin with release 2009.1.1.
Kroah-Hartman points out that the naming scheme provides a better way to determine how old the release is. Kernel 2004.9.0 would be easier to date than Kernel 2.6.9.
The current scheme follows the pattern 2. major_release.minor_release.extra_version. With the new scheme, kernel macros with major and minor numbers would also have compatible naming so as not to break scripts, he assures the community in his email.
Among the first responses was one from H. Peter Anvin who found it easiest just to increment the last digit, such as 27, 28, 29, etc. He finds the existing prefix 2 with the large following digits to have "outlived its utility" and suggests bumping the version to 3.0 and maintaining that scheme for "huge changes."
Adrian Bunk had rather a different view and warned against radical changes that could affect not only the Kernel and its tools, but break countless userspace programs. Many of these programs interpret the kernel version number through calls such as uname -r. He gives a snippet from an OpenSSL library script as an example.
Comments
comments powered by DisqusSubscribe to our Linux Newsletters
Find Linux and Open Source Jobs
Subscribe to our ADMIN Newsletters
Support Our Work
Linux Magazine content is made possible with support from readers like you. Please consider contributing when you’ve found an article to be beneficial.

News
-
Akamai Will Host kernel.org
The organization dedicated to cloud-based solutions has agreed to host kernel.org to deliver long-term stability for the development team.
-
Linux Kernel 6.14 Released
The latest Linux kernel has arrived with extra Rust support and more.
-
EndeavorOS Mercury Neo Available
A new release from the EndeavorOS team ships with Plasma 6.3 and other goodies.
-
Fedora 42 Beta Has Arrived
The Fedora Project has announced the availability of the first beta release for version 42 of the open-source distribution.
-
Dash to Panel Maintainer Quits
Charles Gagnon has stepped away as maintainer of the popular Dash to Panel Gnome extension.
-
CIQ Releases Security-Hardened Version of Rocky Linux
If you're looking for an enterprise-grade Linux distribution that is hardened for business use, there's a new version of Rocky Linux that's sure to make you and your company happy.
-
Gnome’s Dash to Panel Extension Gets a Massive Update
If you're a fan of the Gnome Dash to Panel extension, you'll be thrilled to hear that a new version has been released with a dock mode.
-
Blender App Makes it to the Big Screen
The animated film "Flow" won the Oscar for Best Animated Feature at the 97th Academy Awards held on March 2, 2025 and Blender was a part of it.
-
Linux Mint Retools the Cinnamon App Launcher
The developers of Linux Mint are working on an improved Cinnamon App Launcher with a better, more accessible UI.
-
New Linux Tool for Security Issues
Seal Security is launching a new solution to automate fixing Linux vulnerabilities.
Age of release
Even better would be YYYY.MM.1.
nice idea but,
most sensible out of all
Though I'm one of those who really thinks that changing now kernel versioning provides little to no gains.
To me it more and more sounds like lots of people are bothered by visibly smaller role kernel now is playing in the whole "Linux OS" thing. Seems like people want some shake up of kernel development to make their contributions look more significant.
I see the flame war starting...