Exploring the OpenVAS vulnerability scanner

Validating Your Results

As with most automated procedures that haven't been tuned, the danger of false positives is revealed in the first few OpenVAS scans. The technical staff should analyze each issue to determine whether the item is a false positive. This analysis usually consists of verifying that a reported service is, in fact, running on an open port and is responding. Sometimes false positives are the result of the technical staff modifying the software locally, such as when vendors back-port patches into a supported version of a package. If possible, the quickest way to validate your results is to compare the version of the software running on the remote system against versions listed in the various vulnerability databases.

If the results appear valid, your next step might be simply to trust OpenVAS and follow the recommendations given in the report, which could entail disabling a server or service. However, if you're feeling inquisitive, you might want to recreate the issue manually to better understand the context.

Writing Plugins In NASL

Like Nessus, OpenVAS lets you create your own plugins for custom security checks with the Nessus Attack Scripting Language (NASL). See the NASL Reference Guide, which is available online [3] for more on working with NASL. Listing 1 addresses a few of the basic features you'll need to address when working with NASL.

In Listing 1, the description block holds metadata about the plugin, including a description of the vulnerability, details about the plugin category, and information on any dependencies the script might have. In this case, you can see that the check is for CVE-2009-3023, a stack overflow that was reported in Microsoft's IIS FTP server.

Listing 1

Building an NASL Plugin

 

Below the description block is a definition of the check itself. As you can see, the script checks to see that the specified port is open and then makes a call to the internal knowledge base to ensure that a writable directory is detected by the dependency plugin ftp_writeable_directories.nasl. If this is the case, the script then connects to the port and fetches the FTP banner. Once it has a banner, it compares the banner against known vulnerable versions and reports as necessary. The check knows that version 5.0 is definitely vulnerable, so it reports a hole in this case, but in other cases where Microsoft FTP server is running, a warning is issued.

The code in Listing 1 is a fairly simple example of a NASL script. NASL is a domain-specific language with a lot of security-specific functions. Although some questioned Tenable's decision to implement a whole new language, NASL is designed to be secure and provide the tools necessary to check even quite complex vulnerabilities. The NASL language includes built-in functions for packet crafting, packet capture, and many other useful tasks.

Conclusions

OpenVAS is a valuable tool for managing vulnerabilities. Although a tool like OpenVAS is very useful for identifying potential issues in targets and products, it is up to the technical staff to act on the reports and resolve the issues.

The Author

Geoff Galitz has been in the UNIX systems field for 18 years. He enjoys writing, teaching, exploring new technologies, and life on his little farm in rural Germany. He runs a consulting and training firm called Eifel Consulting. You can reach Geoff at mailto:geoff@eifel-consulting.eu.

Tim Brown has been working as an senior information security consultant at Portcullis for 5 years, having previously worked in financial institutions and telcos. Outside of his day job, he is technical director of Public Internet and a contributor to a variety of projects, including Indymedia and Debian. He tweets in Perl and was last spotted in a field in Holland attending HAR2009. Email Tim at mailto:timb@nth-dimension.org.uk.

Buy Linux Magazine

SINGLE ISSUES
 
SUBSCRIPTIONS
 
TABLET & SMARTPHONE APPS
Get it on Google Play

US / Canada

Get it on Google Play

UK / Australia

Related content

  • OpenVAS

    The more IT infrastructure complexity increases, the more indispensable vulnerability scanners become. If you are not interested in retaining the consulting services of a professional hacker, you might want to entrust the task of detecting vulnerabilities to a specialized software tool, such as OpenVAS.

  • Network Scanner OpenVAS 2.0 Enters Beta

    Beta test of the Open Vulnerability Assessment System (OpenVAS) is targeted at experienced users and developers of security solutions.

  • Smart Home Security

    Many IoT devices are so poorly protected against attacks that it is easy for an intruder to slip inside. With the right tools and best practices, you can bar the door.

  • Charly’s Column: w3af

    After toiling away to create a small but exclusive website, Charly wanted to run a security scanner against it to check for vulnerabilities. The choice of tools is enormous, but Charly chose w3af.

comments powered by Disqus
Subscribe to our Linux Newsletters
Find Linux and Open Source Jobs
Subscribe to our ADMIN Newsletters

Support Our Work

Linux Magazine content is made possible with support from readers like you. Please consider contributing when you’ve found an article to be beneficial.

Learn More

News